If I Picked the Winners: Best Supporting Actress 2010

     The 2010 Academy Awards season may be good and done with (culminating to that anti-climatic snoozer of a show on Sunday), but I am going to spend the next few weeks wrapping up this year's Oscars and giving my opinion on who should have won the major awards (although it looks like I won't be able to see "Buitiful" until it comes out to rent, so Best Actor will have to be delayed for awhile). For the first post-Oscar addition of "If I Picked the Winners", I'm going to start with what was seen as the tightest race in the "Big 8" categories going into the night: Best Supporting Actress. For a good long time, the award was all but wrapped up for Melissa Leo's portrait of Alice Ward, the mother of the boxing half-brothers Dickey Eklund (Christian Bale) and Mickey Ward (Mark Wahlberg) in the film "The Fighter". Then, scandal broke when Melissa Leo put her "homemade" FYC (For Your Consideration) ads in the trade papers, a move that reportedly rubbed some Hollywood insiders the wrong way. The award then seemed to be a toss-up, with many people (including myself) predicting a win for Helena Bonham Carter due to the love for "The King's Speech". In the end though, the "scandal" turned out to be more of an internet story than anything else (or maybe it did tighten up the race significantly, who knows), because Melissa Leo took the stage Sunday night and made ABC's censors earn their keep.

     Despite the apparent competitiveness of the race, in all honesty (as you will come to see momentarily), I was not all that thrilled with this year's line-up. It's true that it may have not been the richest field of any Oscar category of any year ever, but their were some fine performances that the Academy missed. The most noticeable and egregious absence, was that of Lesley Manville's in the wonderful British film, "Another Year". Manville gave one of the best performances of any actress this year (and actor too for that matter), but one of the likely reasons for Manville's MIA status was category confusion, as it was never 100% clear if she should be included in the Best Supporting Actress race or the Best Actress race (in all honesty, I would have put her in the Best Actress race). Another woman I would have liked to seen nominated in this category (and someone that Academy members can't use "category confusion" as an excuse to why she was not nominated) is Mila Kunis for "Black Swan". As the true antagonist in the film (even if it is imagined), her performance really keeps the tension rising at all times, which allows Natalie Portman's performance to be the powerful work that it is and the reason she took home Oscar Gold Sunday night. Finally, even though she never had a prayer in hades to be nominated, I was stunned at the all-out commitment to the role that Ellen Wong gave to her character Knives Chau in the underrated film "Scott Pilgrim vs. the World". Her obsessively devoted fan and ex-girlfriend of Scott Pilgrim helps make it the hilarious film that it is. We have to deal with cards we were given though, so now on to ranking this year's nominees.

News: Tarantino's Spaghetti Western

     In the most possible exciting news I could report, Quentin Tarantino has confirmed that his next film will be a spaghetti western, a homage to the work of Sergio Leone. There are no real details on the story yet, but Tarantino will reportedly finish the script in the next few months with plans to start shooting some time this year. Hopefully then we will be looking at a 2012 release, but we may have to wait to 2013. As for the cast, while there are rumors of a couple different people, the only confirmed to be involved is Christophe Waltz, who won Best Supporting Actor for his amazing portrayal of Nazi "Jew Hunter" Hans Landa in Tarantino's last film, "Inglorious Bastards". If you read my "Top 100 Favorite Films" articles, you'll know that Tarantino is my all-time favorite director. The man is a movie making genius. 7 films, 7 masterpieces. I'm already counting down the time until this movie arrives! (If you want to read more about the news, click here).

News: Oscar Postmortem

     Where should I begin? I think I will start with my own predictions. After doing a decent job of forecasting the Oscar nominations, I was a bit disappointed with my prognosticating powers to pick the winners. I was 16/24 (or 2/3, 0.67777777777) which isn't terrible, but I felt like I could have done better. There were a lot of tough categories this year, especially some of the tech categories, but I still think I should have seen some things coming. In particular, in the Best Costume Design and Best Art Direction categories, I knew "Alice in Wonderland" was the most obvious choice, but my hatred for the movie, as well as getting caught up in the whole "The King's Speech" sweep talk, led me astray from two choices that would have bumped me up to a healthy 18 correct predictions. Hopefully it is a lesson learned for next year.

     Then there was the show itself, which is not going to win any "Best Awards Show" award any time soon. In someways, it was a much cleaner production than previous years, and I did love some of the production design of the stage, but the main problem was the show's hosts, in particular James Franco. While Anne Hathaway wasn't very funny, at least she was giving it her all and did the show with a pleasant smile, which is much more than I can say for James Franco. I don't know if it was stage fright, some subversive "too cool for school" act, or if he was just stoned out of his mind, but whatever it was, he would have done the Academy a better service if he hadn't shown up at all. He easily takes the cake as the worst host in Oscar history, and it just proved why they should let comedians handle the job. Contrasted with the hilarious Ricky Gervais hosted Golden Globe awards, the Oscars were pathetic, but the delicate sensibilities of the Hollywood elite (whose thin skin made sure that Gervais will never host a significant awards ceremony again), guarantee that we will never see a comedic host who is deemed "subversive". A good compromise I think though would be to have Ben Stiller host the Oscars. Whenever he has presented an award at the Oscars, he has been one of its highlights, and since he is "one of them", his jabs at other actors come off playful to the elites, but our still funny to the rest of us non-insiders.

     Finally there were the awards themselves. There were a few nice victories. In the night's biggest surprise (which still wasn't that big a shock), I was happy to see long-time Christopher Nolan collaborator Wally Pfister receive his well deserved Best Cinematography award for the camera work of "Inception". I was also quite pleased to see the hilarious live-action short "God of Love" win the Best Live Action Short category (if you haven't seen it, make the effort to find it, it is definitely worth the hassle). Despite what some may say about her f-bomb layered speech, I was glad to see that merit won the day over Victorian rules of behavior and class with Melissa Leo's Best Supporting Actress win. "The Social Network"'s win for Best Film Editing was a nice nod of recognition, and Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross' victory for their haunting soul-searching score to the film was my favorite victory of the night, and saved the show from being a total disgrace.

     Even though I knew it was coming, I am still having a hard time swallowing the fact that Tom Hooper won Best Director and "The King's Speech" won Best Picture. Luckily the film did not get the massive sweep that many were predicting (winning only four Oscars, compared to the 7/8 some were expecting), showing the Academy did take time to consider the merits of each category, but it is still disappointing to see something so trite beat a film as well executed, and as insightful as "The Social Network". Hell, even if say something like "Black Swan" or "Inception" had won instead, while not my first choice, at least I could understand the thinking behind it, but "The King's Speech"? And Tom Hooper? Hooper, who made an extremely paint-by-numbers film, beat out not only the great David Fincher, but Darren Aronofsky, the Coen Brothers, and David O. Russell (not to mention non-nominees Christopher Nolan and Danny Boyle). These are some of the best auteurs of their generation, and they lost to this stereo-typical (even if well meaning) puff film. It's really a shame and another entry in the Academy's long list of goofs. Especially after a few years of some decent choices ("The Departed", "No Country for Old Men", and "The Hurt Locker"), to see them slide back to awarded typical prestige-fare is disheartening. As always, time will be the ultimate judge, and in 20 years, people are still going to be watching and analyzing "The Social Network", while the only thing "The King's Speech" will be remembered for is that it won Best Picture. Of course it is the Academy's right to make crappy decisions, just as it is mine to complain about them, and so it appears the typical cycle starts again until hopefully next year, when they might actually award something worthwhile.

(For a complete list of last night's winners, click here).

    

Predicting the Winners: 2010 Oscar Preview

     It's now time to put up or shut up and predict this year's Academy Award winners. Now if you are just looking for a quick handicap for your own Oscar ballot, at the bottom of this article I have provided my predictions for every category, but if your interested in a more detailed breakdown, I will give brief analysis for each of the major eight categories.

     If your an avid follower of Oscar blogs, about this time each year you begin to hear from the bloggers about how fatigued they are, and how this year has been so much nastier than the previous years in terms of level of discourse. I guess it is just human nature to always see a perpetually worsening (or sometimes improving) situation, even when it is really just staying the same. The key in any competitive situation that divides people into warring camps, such as the Oscar race, is to just ignore the extremists and exaggerators and just try to have a little fun with it. After all, the Academy Awards are ultimately a very trivial event that is far from a life and death situation. That being said, putting on my film enthusiast cap, I have been pretty disappointed with the turn of events in this awards season. As many of you know, I count myself as one of the leading members of "The Social Network" fanclub, so to see the early frontrunner fall from grace in favor of the mediocre "The King's Speech" has been a let down to say the least. Especially given the Academy's surprising good taste over the last few years, to see it slip back into its pattern of rewarding typical "Oscar bait" prestige fare is disheartening, but I guess that's the way it crumbles, cookie-wise.